Many IT leaders remain uncertain about the differences between Zero Trust and SASE. Both are important concepts for enterprise cybersecurity, but they’re not the same thing. Zero Trust is a security model that’s based on a “never trust, always verify” principle.
Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) is an architecture that makes those rules enforceable by bringing the security tools required for Zero Trust, including secure web gateways (SWG), cloud access security brokers (CASB), and Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), into a single, unified security framework. Confusing the two can lead to avoidable pain, such as wasted spend, policy gaps, and exposure to unauthorized access.
In this article, we explore the intersection of Zero Trust and SASE, their collaborative approach, and the significance of each for your security strategy. We also highlight where SASE vs. Zero Trust matters most in practice, particularly in the context of SaaS, remote work, and modern IT environments.
Zero Trust architecture
Zero Trust architecture is built on the idea of “never trust, always verify,” a shift away from the older “trust but verify” mindset. It should not be confused with the unrelated cryptographic concept of “zero knowledge.” The primary goals of Zero Trust are to implement tight access control supported by multi-factor authentication (MFA), enforce least privilege access, and minimize lateral movement when granting access across network security layers, workloads, and endpoints.
The benefits to an enterprise are improved access policies and a comprehensive security posture with reduced gaps and fewer opportunities for unauthorized access. However, the challenging part is how to extend Zero-Trust security to the more advanced environment of hybrid IT, which is composed of a combination of on-premises data centers, SaaS, remote work, and cloud-based workloads. To maintain consistent enforcement across such a diverse landscape, security services are commonly integrated, including SWG, CASB, ZTNA, firewall as a service (FWaaS), and data loss prevention (DLP).
In addition, there is the challenge of aligning the need for real-time authentication and automation with the scale requirements of large organizations. Companies can align their security structures with modern network management by reviewing resource articles that explore top SASE providers with SD-WAN and security coverage, examine how zero trust security overlaps with SASE, and provide guidance on implementing SASE in complex environments.
SASE framework
SASE is an acronym for Secure Access Service Edge, referring to an architecture model that integrates SD-WAN and security solutions and delivers them from the cloud. This includes components like SWG, CASB, ZTNA, and FWaaS. Rather than having each of these elements operate independently, organizations can establish policies that span data centers, cloud applications, and software-as-a-service platforms, while still maintaining authentication and access control.
In SASE, the actual enforcement point for these policies is referred to as the Security Service Edge (SSE). Its three main elements (SWG, CASB, and ZTNA) bring Zero Trust Network Access principles to life by validating every access request, inspecting network traffic, and denying those deemed suspicious or risky. These help to improve the security posture, reduce the attack surface, and simplify the challenge of policy alignment for both on-premises and cloud-native infrastructures.
Typical use cases involve using SSE as a replacement for VPNs for remote access, enabling secure remote work and reducing security tool sprawl by consolidating various security functions within a single framework. The scale of SASE also makes it well-suited for endpoint protection, workload, and SaaS protection in hybrid environments. In the comparison SASE vs. ZTNA, SASE provides the infrastructure, while ZTNA enables more granular access decisions.
Integration complexity, vendor lock-in, and potential operational disruption are common challenges to wider adoption. Since common challenges and solutions for new frameworks often require centralized visibility and control, the Tufin Orchestration Suite can be leveraged to align policies and automation between on-premises and cloud environments. Plus, the top firewall features to secure your network should be kept in mind to ensure the SASE solution provides value.
Comparison of SASE and Zero Trust
SASE and Zero Trust are frequently discussed together, but they aren’t identical. Zero Trust refers to a security model based on the “never trust, always verify” principle. SASE is a delivery framework built on top of SD-WAN that unites cloud-based security services. Paired together, they provide enterprises with both a cloud security strategy and the necessary infrastructure to execute it.
Zero Trust architecture and SASE also differ in scope. Zero Trust focuses on identity, access management, and policy enforcement to deny unauthorized access. SASE architecture, on the other hand, bundles Zero Trust security services, such as SWG, CASB, ZTNA, and FWaaS, into a single framework. This article on Zero Trust, SASE, and SSE provides a more detailed explanation of how these two approaches complement each other rather than compete against one another.
In practical terms, SASE solutions are the delivery layer for Zero Trust principles. For instance, organizations can apply consistent policies across cloud services, SaaS, and workloads using SASE, while ZTNA takes care of the nitty-gritty of who’s allowed in and under which conditions. Other SASE vs. Zero Trust comparisons break down how Zero Trust helps define the overall security strategy while SASE provides the needed functions for enforcement in real-time.
Deciding how to prioritize comes down to practical considerations for IT leaders. Vendor lock-in, complexity, and potential disruption to existing VPNs or data center networks are common challenges. Tufin Orchestration Suite can help with alignment by providing teams with a unified control plane that delivers centralized visibility, automated policy orchestration, and continuous compliance across hybrid environments.
IT leaders can also reference resources like the top SD-WAN providers and how to compare them and the SD-WAN security checklist for IT leaders when making infrastructure decisions. With a clear understanding of the strategy vs. framework, enterprises can focus on where to apply Zero Trust security while using SASE providers to scale protection across modern IT environments.
Key takeaways for enterprises
SASE and Zero Trust represent distinct concepts but deliver enhanced security benefits when combined. Zero Trust security operates under a never trust, always verify philosophy. The security services of a SASE solution extend Zero Trust policies to SaaS, other cloud services, on-premises workloads, and remote access points. The difference between SASE and Zero Trust can help IT decision-makers formulate a security strategy that enhances their security posture, reduces the attack surface, and ensures unauthorized users never gain access to all workloads.
With SSE, DLP, and automation, teams can maintain consistent policies in real-time and optimize network management across a complex IT environment. To see how this approach can work for your organization, sign up to get a demo.
Frequently asked questions
Is SASE the same as Zero Trust, and how does the SASE vs. Zero Trust comparison affect enterprise planning?
No, SASE is not the same as Zero Trust. Zero Trust is a security model, and SASE is the framework that can provide it through solutions like SWG, CASB, ZTNA, and FWaaS. Confusing the two can lead to either overlapping (resulting in resource waste) or insufficient coverage (creating a security risk).
Learn about the common implementation challenges and solutions to see how enterprises are managing this transition in the real world.
What are the main disadvantages in the SASE vs. Zero Trust discussion for large organizations?
Complexity of integration, vendor lock-in, and inconsistent policy management in hybrid infrastructures are some of the top pain points. These challenges can slow down adoption and frustrate teams responsible for access control and automation enforcement across cloud and on-premises environments.
Learn how to handle fragmented security policies in hybrid environments to know how to deal with these challenges in the real world.
How do IT leaders evaluate solutions in the SASE vs. Zero Trust decision?
Decision-making often involves evaluating a provider’s scalability, range of vendor integrations, and alignment with Zero Trust principles. IT leaders typically compare SD-WAN performance, firewall features, and policy management tools. The goal is to establish a framework that can scale with changing workloads and remote access demands.
Learn about the best SASE providers with SD-WAN and security coverage and the top firewall features to secure your network to inform your planning.
Ready to Learn More
Get a Demo
